While the old average
SPECmark89 has been popular with the
industry and the press,
SPEC has intentionally *not* defined
1992 suites (
CINT92 and
CFP92), for the following reasons:
benchmarks, the average would be biased too much toward
floating-point. Customers' workloads are different, some
integer-only, some floating-point intensive, some mixed.
Current processors have developed their strengths in a more
diverse way (some more emphasizing integer performance, some
more floating-point performance) than in 1989.
Some SPECmark results are available
here.
(1994-11-15)